40 True/False Questions
1–10: True/False Questions on Engagement Letters
- The engagement letter
must be issued before the audit begins.
Answer: True
Explanation: The engagement letter formalizes the agreement and sets the scope before starting the audit. - An engagement letter
should include the auditor’s liability limitations.
Answer: False
Explanation: Liability limitations are only included when legally permitted and agreed upon with the client. - Engagement letters must
specify the form of the audit report.
Answer: True
Explanation: The engagement letter outlines the format and content of the audit report. - An engagement letter is
only required for first-time engagements.
Answer: False
Explanation: Engagement letters are required for all clients and must be reissued if terms change. - The auditor can begin
the audit without a signed engagement letter.
Answer: False
Explanation: A signed engagement letter is required to formalize the terms of the engagement. - The client’s
acknowledgment of its responsibilities is included in the engagement
letter.
Answer: True
Explanation: Management’s responsibilities, such as preparing financial statements, must be outlined. - Engagement letters are
optional for recurring audits with the same client.
Answer: False
Explanation: Engagement letters should be issued for recurring audits to address any changes in terms. - Engagement letters help
reduce disputes by clarifying terms.
Answer: True
Explanation: Clear terms in the engagement letter minimize misunderstandings and disputes. - The engagement letter
is sent after substantive audit procedures begin.
Answer: False
Explanation: The engagement letter must be sent and agreed upon before the audit begins. - A reference to
applicable financial reporting frameworks must be included in the
engagement letter.
Answer: True
Explanation: This ensures the audit aligns with the relevant standards.
11–20: True/False Questions on Client Acceptance
- The auditor must
perform client due diligence before accepting a new client.
Answer: True
Explanation: Due diligence ensures the auditor understands potential risks and complies with legal requirements. - Refusal to contact the
previous auditor is a valid reason to decline an engagement.
Answer: True
Explanation: Lack of communication with the previous auditor may indicate underlying issues. - Client acceptance
involves assessing the integrity of management.
Answer: True
Explanation: Management’s integrity is a critical factor in determining the risk of the engagement. - The client’s financial
profitability is the most important factor in engagement acceptance.
Answer: False
Explanation: Ethical and legal compliance, not profitability, is the primary focus. - The auditor must accept
all engagements if legally permitted.
Answer: False
Explanation: The auditor must assess risks, ethical concerns, and resource availability before acceptance. - The auditor should
evaluate the adequacy of resources before accepting an engagement.
Answer: True
Explanation: Adequate resources, such as staff and expertise, are essential for effective audit execution. - Refusing client
identification verification is grounds to decline the engagement.
Answer: True
Explanation: Verification is required for compliance with anti-money laundering regulations. - Communication with the
previous auditor is mandatory for all engagements.
Answer: False
Explanation: It is required only if the client has previous auditors, and client permission must be obtained. - The auditor is required
to ensure the client has strong internal controls before acceptance.
Answer: False
Explanation: The auditor evaluates risks but is not responsible for ensuring internal control strength. - High-risk engagements
should always be declined.
Answer: False
Explanation: High-risk engagements can be accepted if risks are mitigated through expertise and additional procedures.
21–30: True/False Questions on Ethical Considerations
- Independence is a
fundamental requirement for auditors when accepting engagements.
Answer: True
Explanation: Independence ensures the objectivity and credibility of the auditor’s work. - Familiarity with the
client over a long period enhances independence.
Answer: False
Explanation: Long-term familiarity can impair independence and lead to biases. - Conflicts of interest
must be disclosed to the client and addressed before engagement.
Answer: True
Explanation: Transparency in handling conflicts ensures compliance with ethical standards. - The auditor may accept
engagements even if the client has unresolved disputes with regulators.
Answer: False
Explanation: Such disputes may pose ethical and legal risks and should be carefully evaluated. - Ethical concerns are
secondary to financial profitability when accepting engagements.
Answer: False
Explanation: Ethical considerations take precedence over financial aspects. - Auditors can guarantee
the accuracy of financial statements.
Answer: False
Explanation: Auditors provide reasonable assurance, not guarantees. - Auditors must assess
their competence before accepting specialized engagements.
Answer: True
Explanation: Competence ensures the auditor can handle the engagement effectively. - Auditors can prepare
financial statements for the client and conduct the audit.
Answer: False
Explanation: Preparing financial statements impairs independence and is a conflict of interest. - The auditor must ensure
compliance with professional ethics during engagement acceptance.
Answer: True
Explanation: Ethical compliance is a critical aspect of the engagement acceptance process. - The auditor should
refuse engagements where ethical threats cannot be mitigated.
Answer: True
Explanation: Ethical threats that cannot be addressed require the auditor to decline the engagement.
31–40: True/False Questions on Risk Assessment and Engagement Processes
- Risk assessment is
optional during engagement acceptance.
Answer: False
Explanation: Risk assessment is critical to identifying potential challenges and deciding on acceptance. - Clients with dominant
management personalities may pose higher risks.
Answer: True
Explanation: Dominant personalities increase the risk of bias and control overrides. - The engagement letter
reduces the auditor’s liability entirely.
Answer: False
Explanation: While it helps manage liability, it does not eliminate it. - The auditor should
assess both the client’s industry risks and internal risks.
Answer: True
Explanation: A thorough risk assessment includes external and internal factors. - Weak internal controls
always result in a modified audit opinion.
Answer: False
Explanation: Weak controls require enhanced audit procedures, not necessarily a modified opinion. - The engagement letter
must be updated annually for recurring clients.
Answer: False
Explanation: It is updated only when significant changes occur. - Refusal to allow access
to records is grounds for declining the engagement.
Answer: True
Explanation: Access to records is essential for obtaining sufficient appropriate evidence. - High-risk engagements
should involve additional planning and expertise.
Answer: True
Explanation: High-risk clients require enhanced procedures and experienced personnel. - The engagement letter
should include the auditor’s responsibilities for fraud detection.
Answer: False
Explanation: The engagement letter clarifies that the auditor’s responsibility is to provide reasonable assurance, not to detect all fraud. - Money laundering risks
must be addressed before accepting the engagement.
Answer: True
Explanation: Anti-money laundering compliance is a key requirement during client acceptance.
No comments:
Post a Comment